- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 27
chore(tooling): setup GitHub actions, add CODEOWNERS and PR template #20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }} | ||
| strategy: | ||
| fail-fast: false | ||
| matrix: | ||
| os: [ubuntu-latest] | ||
| node: ['16'] | ||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v2 | ||
|  | ||
| - uses: actions/setup-java@v2 | ||
| with: | ||
| distribution: 'zulu' | ||
| java-version: '11' | ||
|  | ||
| - uses: actions/setup-node@v2 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: ${{ matrix.node }} | ||
| cache: 'yarn' | ||
| cache-dependency-path: 'yarn.lock' | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wonder if we can add this whole part to a local GH action, will check 🤔
a918eeb    to
    a59eac0      
    Compare
  
    There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Beautiful CI ! 🥳
|  | ||
| on: [push] | ||
|  | ||
| jobs: | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This job could depend on specs because it won't build with invalid spec.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done, apparently the workflow_run option is only triggered when deployed on the main branch, which seems odd 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From what I remember when I worked on Github Actions, there are a bunch of things that worked only on main and not on prs, this was quite an annoying limitation :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will see once this PR is merged and will fix if it's not the case!
|  | ||
| - uses: actions/setup-node@v2 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: 16 | 
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you link this to .nvmrc ? It's seems possible but not supported by default: issue
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good idea, seems to work this way: https://github.com/actions/setup-node/blob/d08cf222111d5c1d21b3cd4b958937f818d10d9a/docs/advanced-usage.md#node-version-file
done in: 9d2b059
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feature was released just 5 hours ago ! I think the github cache is not updated yet:
Warning: Unexpected input(s) 'node-version-file', valid inputs are ['always-auth', 'node-version', 'architecture', 'check-latest', 'registry-url', 'scope', 'token', 'cache', 'cache-dependency-path', 'version']
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe you can pin setup-node to version 2.5.0 ? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe you can pin setup-node to version 2.5.0
It seems to work now!
36749c2    to
    7f9c932      
    Compare
  
    fb35317    to
    16c597b      
    Compare
  
    There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's go !
🧭 What and Why
🎟 JIRA Ticket: https://algolia.atlassian.net/browse/APIC-180
Changes included :
buildandvalidatespec filesgenerate,buildandlintJavaScript clientCODEOWNERSfilePULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATEfile🧪 Test